Korg Ms20 Vst Install The Korg

Sonically, the results were similar, although it was not hard to differentiate one from the other.

In many ways, this isnt surprising, because it shouldnt be too difficult to duplicate the function and sound of a vintage digital synth in a new digital form.

But what of the other components of the Collection, MS20 and Polysix Can Korg recreate their success when called upon to model the distinctive sounds and vagaries of two of its most famous analogue synths This month, its Legacy MS20 s turn for a thorough examination.

Once you have done so, you can use Legacy MS20 as a stand-alone program, or as a VST or AU plug-in.

You can also use it within the Legacy Cell environment, which we will look at next month.

If, like me, youre connecting it to a Mac, you need do no more; the controller will be recognised by the OS X Audio MIDI Setup software.

Korg Ms20 Vst Install The Korg

Windows XP users, on the other hand, will need to log on as administrators, and perform a 10-step procedure to install the Korg USB MIDI driver.

In other words, the front-panel patch points are not real CV connections, and you should not attempt to input control voltages from other synths.

These are somewhat loosely named, though, because you can play in Edit View and edit in Play View, and both views display the parameter values when you hover over the knobs.

However, Play View shows only the front-panel controls that were present on the original synth, while Edit View shows all the additional facilities available.

Given that my Powerbook displays 1440 horizontal pixels, I would be much happier if I could use this version to program and patch Legacy MS20.

They call this CMT, which stands for Component Modelling Technology, and claim the following: CMT takes an organic approach to modelling, duplicating the circuit path of a synthesizer by recreating each individual component transistor, capacitor, resistor, etc.

CMTs cloning of the entire instrument ensures that every nuance is replicated.

I have doubts about this specifically about the suggestion that the software synth is constructed in a single operation from models of individual components.

Certainly, there is software that does what Korg claim; its used by circuit designers to prototype boards without having to build them.

However, the processing requirements are considerable, and modelling even uncomplicated analogue circuitry remains, even on todays computers, an off-line, non-real-time process.

The Macs and PCs on which the Legacy Collection runs do not offer sufficient power to model every component in a synthesizer individually in real time in this way.

It might be possible if CMT was a linear representation that ignored all the non-linear responses of the circuits, but this would generate a very sterile sound, not at all similar to the original synth.

For this reason, I feel that Korgs description of CMT was probably invented by their marketing department, not their engineers.

If this is the case, I cant imagine why; no matter how Korg have achieved it, the recreation of the MS20 is impressive enough not to need such help.

Firstly, they chose different ranges for the two, with VCO1 offering 32, 16, 8 and 4 options, while VCO2 was offset to 16, 8, 4 and 2, with a fine-tuning control offering a range of 12 semitones.

Secondly, they gave both different waveforms, with VCO1 providing triangle, sawtooth, a variable-width pulse and white noise, and VCO2 offering sawtooth, square, a tight pulse with a duty cycle of less than 10 percent, and a so-called ring modulator.

It must have been tempting to add the MS10s pulse-width modulation to VCO1, or to add oscillator sync, but they didnt, and decisions like this make the emulation far more accurate and eccentric than it might otherwise have been.

I started by testing the triangle waves produced by the two synths.